The individual mandate no longer applies to people
whose plans were canceled
By Ezra Klein, Updated: - Washington Post
Today, the Obama administration announced that people whose insurance plans
were canceled this year will "temporarily" be exempted from the law's individual
mandate. Here's how they're doing it -- and what it means for the law.
HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius jyst delayed the
individual mandate for people whose plans have been canceled. (Photo by J. Scott
Applewhite/AP)
1. The individual mandate includes a "hardship exemption." People who qualify
can either ignore the individual mandate altogether or purchase a cheap,
bare-bones catastrophic insurance plan that's typically only available to people
under 30.
2. According to HHS,
the exemption covers people who "experienced financial or domestic
circumstances, including an unexpected natural or human-caused event, such
that he or she had a significant, unexpected increase in essential expenses
that prevented him or her from obtaining coverage under a qualified health
plan."
3. Today, the administration agreed with a group of senators, led by Mark
Warner of Virginia, who argued that having your insurance plan canceled counted
as "an unexpected natural or human-caused event." For these people, in other
words, Obamacare itself is the hardship. You can read HHS Secretary Kathleen
Sebelius' full letter here.
HHS's formal guidance is here.
4. How may people does this affect? No one quite knows. Republicans estimate
that about 5 million people have seen their plans canceled. The Obama
administration believes the number, at this point, is actually in the hundreds
of thousands. There's no truly reliable figure here.
5. The Obama administration argues that there's little reason to fear that
these people won't purchase health insurance if they could otherwise afford to.
After all, they were already buying health insurance on the individual market
before there was any penalty at all. They clearly want health insurance. This
just smooths their transition and, in the cases where there really is financial
strain, gives them time to figure out a solution.
6. But this puts the administration on some very difficult-to-defend ground.
Normally, the individual mandate applies to anyone who can purchase qualifying
insurance for less than 8 percent of their income. Either that threshold is
right or it's wrong. But it's hard to argue that it's right for the currently
uninsured but wrong for people whose plans were canceled.
7. Put more simply, Republicans will immediately begin calling for the
uninsured to get this same exemption. What will the Obama administration say in
response? Why are people who plans were canceled more deserving of help than
people who couldn't afford a plan in the first place?
8. The same goes for the cheap catastrophic plans sold to customers under age
30 in the exchanges. A 45-year-old whose plan just got canceled can now purchase
catastrophic coverage. A 45-year-old who didn't have insurance at all can't. Why
don't people who couldn't afford a plan in the first place deserve the same kind
of help as people whose plans were canceled?
9. The insurers aren't happy. "This latest rule change could cause
significant instability in the marketplace and lead to further confusion and
disruption for consumers," says Karen Ignani, head of the trade group America's
Health Insurance Plans. They worry the White House is underestimating the number
of people whose plans have been canceled and who will opt to either remain
uninsured or buy catastrophic insurance rather than more comprehensive
coverage.
10. This puts the first crack in the individual mandate. The question is
whether it's the last. If Democratic members of Congress see this as
solving their political problem with people whose plans have been canceled, it
could help them stand against Republican efforts to delay the individual
mandate. But if congressional Democrats use this ruling as an excuse to delay or
otherwise de-fang the individual mandate for anyone who doesn't want to pay for
insurance under Obamacare, then it'll be a very big problem for the law.